Registration | About | Legal | Contact

SubscriptionSubscribe: RSS | Email

About This Site

The goal of this site is to provide information to the legal community, human resources professionals and the general public on interesting and relevant developments in the field of labour and employment law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute a legal opinion its creator, Gabriel Granatstein nor any other author or undertaking, which accepts or assume no responsibility for its contents. Click here for more info.

« Rise in National Minimum Wage in the UK | Main | Economic downturns and terminations »
Tuesday
Oct092012

Gender identity protected under human rights legislation

In the span of one week in June, Ontario and Manitoba joined the Northwest Territories as the only Canadian jurisdictions to include gender identity as a prohibited ground of discrimination under human rights legislation.

Ontario, meanwhile, took the additional step of also adding gender expression as a protected ground.

While the moves may signal a broader trend towards bringing gender identity under the explicit protection of human rights legislation, they will likely have little practical impact on employers since discrimination based on gender identity had already been generally covered under sex-based discrimination.

Still, the additions demonstrate the growing recognition of discrimination based on gender identity issues. To understand what those issues encompass, however, it is helpful to consult the policies and guidelines published by Human Rights Commissions.

The Ontario Human Rights Commission describes gender identity as being “linked to an individual’s intrinsic sense of self and particularly the sense of being male or female.  Gender identity may or may not conform to a person’s birth-assigned sex.  The personal characteristics that are associated with gender identity include self-image, physical and biological appearance, expression, behaviour and conduct, as they relate to gender.” For example, individuals whose birth-assigned sex does not conform to their gender identity include transsexuals (those who were identified at birth as one sex but who self-identify differently), transgenderists (those whose life experience includes existing in more than one gender), intersexed persons (those not easily classified as male or female based on their physical characteristics at birth or after puberty, formerly described as hermaphrodites) and cross-dressers.

The Manitoba Human Rights Commission, meanwhile, describes gender identity as “a person’s internal, individual experience of gender.” This is separate from sexual orientation, which refers to “whether a person’s romantic, affectional or sexual attraction is heterosexual (‘straight’), homosexual (‘gay’, ‘lesbian’) or bisexual (‘bi’).”

In the workplace, examples of discrimination based on gender identity could include denying a transsexual employee access to washroom facilities appropriate to their gender identity or failing to reasonably accommodate a transgendered employee’s request for leave for medical treatment related to gender identity.

As for dress codes, the Manitoba Human Rights Commission says that such codes do not generally contravene the province’s Human Rights Code. But if an employer requires all employees to wear a standard sex-specific uniform without reasonable cause, “it may result in discrimination against employees who are adversely affected by this policy based on their gender identity and who do not have a uniform option of comparable comfort and dignity to that of other staff. An alternative approach might be to allow for more individual expression of gender within a broader range of uniform options.”

Despite the fact that employers will likely have to make few practical changes based on the recent legal updates, it is still worth reviewing policies, procedures and conduct that could impact gender identity issues in the workplace.

Prepared in collaboration with Joel Kom, summer law student at Norton Rose Canada LLP

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The views expressed here are solely the authors' and should not be attributed to any of their firms or clients.
The material and information provided on this website are for general information only and should not be relied on as legal or business advice or as a legal opinion.
The authors make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, currency, or adequacy of any information linked or referred to or contained on this blog.
No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this blog without first obtaining appropriate professional advice from a consultant or from
a lawyer duly licensed to practise law in the relevant province, state, territory or country. These materials do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and any author.
Please note that the authors will not provide free legal, financial or other advice. Please don't send us any confidential information or questions by email or otherwise because
any information sent to us cannot be considered to be privileged or confidential.

© copyright 2012 Gabriel Granatstein - design by bite47