Registration | About | Legal | Contact

SubscriptionSubscribe: RSS | Email

About This Site

The goal of this site is to provide information to the legal community, human resources professionals and the general public on interesting and relevant developments in the field of labour and employment law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute a legal opinion its creator, Gabriel Granatstein nor any other author or undertaking, which accepts or assume no responsibility for its contents. Click here for more info.

« Gender identity protected under human rights legislation | Main | The introduction of auto-enrolment »
Tuesday
Oct092012

Economic downturns and terminations

The Civil Code of Quebec recognizes that an employer cannot terminate an employment contract without giving reasonable notice, unless there is a serious reason. 

Our courts have addressed the issue of what constitutes a “serious reason” on numerous occasions and always on a case-by-case basis. In the recent decision of CMP Advanced Mechanical Solutions Ltd. v. Snow, 2012 QCCA 1692 (CanLII), Justice Pierre J. Dalphond of the Quebec Court of Appeal confirmed to us what does not constitute a “serious reason” for dismissal without notice, within the meaning of article 2094 CCQ.

In this case, the employer sought to appeal a judgment of the Quebec Superior Court that ordered him to pay his former employee compensation in lieu of notice of termination. The parties were bound by an individual contract of employment with an indeterminate term.

The employee worked for the employer for over 17 years before the employer put an abrupt end to the contract. The employer argued that it was going through an unexpected economic hardship and thus had to terminate the employee, along with 37 others. He claimed that this was a reason serious enough to justify a termination without prior notice.

Justice Dalphond, however, did not retain the employer’s argument. He rather confirmed that, as supported by jurisprudence and doctrine, the financial situation of an employer does not constitute a serious reason, justifying termination without prior notice. Justice Dalphond went on to state that as the employee had a long-term working relationship with his former employer, he was entitled to a notice of a substantial length. After considering the relevant factors of article 2091 CCQ and the employee's duty to mitigate, Justice Dalphond decided that the evidence supported the Superior Court judge's award of a ten-month notice and dismissed the motion for leave to appeal. 

In these difficult times, this decision confirms that the employer's economic situation alone does not justify foregoing notice.  Employers must plan accordingly. While the Superior Court of Quebec has confirmed that the employer's economic situation can be one of many factors taken into account when determining what constitutes reasonable notice (Bernatchez c Commonwealth Plywood ltée, 2012 QCCS 2119 (CanLII)), it remains that the employer will not be successful in arguing that its financial difficulties alone are equivalent to a serious reason for termination without notice.

In collaboration with Melanie Josepovici, student at Norton Rose Canada LLP

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The views expressed here are solely the authors' and should not be attributed to any of their firms or clients.
The material and information provided on this website are for general information only and should not be relied on as legal or business advice or as a legal opinion.
The authors make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, currency, or adequacy of any information linked or referred to or contained on this blog.
No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this blog without first obtaining appropriate professional advice from a consultant or from
a lawyer duly licensed to practise law in the relevant province, state, territory or country. These materials do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and any author.
Please note that the authors will not provide free legal, financial or other advice. Please don't send us any confidential information or questions by email or otherwise because
any information sent to us cannot be considered to be privileged or confidential.

© copyright 2012 Gabriel Granatstein - design by bite47