Registration | About | Legal | Contact

SubscriptionSubscribe: RSS | Email

About This Site

The goal of this site is to provide information to the legal community, human resources professionals and the general public on interesting and relevant developments in the field of labour and employment law. It does not contain a full analysis of the law nor does it constitute a legal opinion its creator, Gabriel Granatstein nor any other author or undertaking, which accepts or assume no responsibility for its contents. Click here for more info.

« Young Liberals vote to expand definition of strikebreakers | Main | Work-life balance: a human rights question »
Monday
Aug162010

Could the Montreal Canadians have a policy of positive discrimination in order to increase the number of French-speaking players from Quebec

This question struck me as I read Rejean Tremblay’s chronicle in La Presse, Le CH abuse des Québécois.

There would be three ways of implementing such a policy.

First, the Habs could have an exclusively French Canadian team, thus excluding all the players having any other origin – I spare you the debate as to what level of  fluency in French one should have. Now, can an employer legitimately discriminate against a group in particular? To this effect, the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms (R.S.Q., chapter C-12) says that:

16. No one may practise discrimination in respect of the hiring, apprenticeship, duration of the probationary period, vocational training, promotion, transfer, displacement, laying-off, suspension, dismissal or conditions of employment of a person or in the establishment of categories or classes of employment.

However:

20. A distinction, exclusion or preference based on the aptitudes or qualifications required for an employment, or justified by the charitable, philanthropic, religious, political or educational nature of a non-profit institution or of an institution devoted exclusively to the well-being of an ethnic group, is deemed non-discriminatory.

Article 20 creates a double exception for (i) a distinction based on the aptitudes or qualifications required for an employment and (ii) a distinction for certain charitable institutions. One must conclude that in both cases, a discriminatory policy against all groups but French Canadians would go against the Charter. As a matter of fact, the Montreal Canadiens are certainly not a charitable institution, nor is French an essential language to master for any hockey player: a unilingual Russian player could very well play in the NHL, so long as he contributes to his teams’ success.

The second possibility would be to have a policy of positive discrimination in favour of French speaking people from Quebec, whether by way of a policy saying that “for an equal talent, the French speaker is prioritized” or by way of establishing a quota of players (for example, there should be 5 French Canadians in the line-up). In the first case, it would be doing an indirect negative discrimination and would thus probably not be legal.  In the latter, the only similar case that I have found was in the Act respecting equal access to employment in public bodies (R.S.Q. c. A-2.01). However, this case is far from being applicable to the Habs: it only applies to public bodies and pursues the following goal:

1.  This Act establishes a special framework to provide equal access to employment in order to remedy the situation experienced by persons belonging to certain groups discriminated against in employment, namely women, handicapped persons within the meaning of the Act to secure handicapped persons in the exercise of their rights with a view to achieving social, school and workplace integration ( chapter E-20.1), aboriginal peoples, persons who are members of visible minorities because of their race or the colour of their skin and persons whose mother tongue is neither French nor English and who belong to a group other than the aboriginal peoples group or the visible minorities group.

However, we are concerned with the opposite situation. I have not heard of any equivalent law that would be applicable in the private sector.

The third possibility would be for the government to enact a legislation forcing the Habs to hire a minimum number of French Canadian players. This law could be valid, although I must confess that I did not consider this question under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms at length. However, the adoption of such legislation is highly unlikely: it would be an undue interference by the government in the business of a team who, after all, made it all the way to semi-finals in the last playoffs.

Finally, I agree with Mr. Tremblay that the best way to see more French-speaking players with the Habs would be through the return of Quebec City’s Nordiques: there would be an all-out war between both teams to conquer the market – a war which could be won by appealing to hearts (and language) of the fans!

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. The views expressed here are solely the authors' and should not be attributed to any of their firms or clients.
The material and information provided on this website are for general information only and should not be relied on as legal or business advice or as a legal opinion.
The authors make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, currency, or adequacy of any information linked or referred to or contained on this blog.
No person should act or refrain from acting in reliance on any information found on this blog without first obtaining appropriate professional advice from a consultant or from
a lawyer duly licensed to practise law in the relevant province, state, territory or country. These materials do not create a solicitor-client relationship between you and any author.
Please note that the authors will not provide free legal, financial or other advice. Please don't send us any confidential information or questions by email or otherwise because
any information sent to us cannot be considered to be privileged or confidential.

© copyright 2012 Gabriel Granatstein - design by bite47